Search portmangroup.org.uk

Close

The alcohol education charity Drinkaware have published a new survey and are urging employers to support staff wellbeing after finding that furloughed workers have been drinking more during lockdown.

Commenting on the survey findings, John Timothy, Chief Executive of the Portman Group, the alcohol industry regulator and social responsibility body, said –

“This important and timely report from Drinkaware adds to our understanding of drinking behaviours during lockdown. Whilst it is heartening to see that the majority of furloughed workers, as with the wider public, are drinking the same or less than before the lockdown, we should be mindful of the small minority who may have increased their drinking to hazardous levels, potentially developing problematic behaviours.

Whilst a small increase in drinking within Government guidelines may not be a cause for immediate alarm, we would encourage anyone concerned about their own or another person’s drinking to visit Drinkaware or the NHS online for free advice and guidance on how to cut down.”

The Portman Group has urged UK drinkers to maintain their responsible approach to alcohol consumption through the bank holiday period and to avoid any temptation to go overboard.  Portman Group Chief Executive John Timothy said:

‘This is a special weekend for many people across the UK and it’s sad that our pubs – so often at the heart of special occasions in our communities – won’t be open for the VE Day 75 celebrations.

‘Nevertheless, we’d urge people to ensure celebrations take place in the right way – respect the lockdown, drink sensibly and in moderation and avoid the urge to overdo it.’

Prior to the lockdown nearly four in five drinkers stayed within the CMO 14 unit guidelines. Since the lockdown studies show that the vast majority of Britons continue to drink the same or less than before the lockdown. Between 24% and 42% of respondents to various studies have reported they were drinking less.

Despite retail sales of alcohol having increased, it has failed to match the drop-in sales in pubs. This overall reduction in alcohol purchased supports a series of studies which show that the vast majority of Britons continue to drink the same or less than before the lockdown.

We expect that more adults than before will enjoy a low alcohol or no alcohol beer or spirit as part of the online celebrations. Figures from Kantar for the Grocer show that sales of low and no alcohol products at supermarkets and off-licences have leapt 18% compared to the first quarter of 2020 and are up 40% compared to 2019, as consumers also stock up on these products as part of continuing responsible drinking habits.

Excessive alcohol consumption is dangerous and should not be downplayed. People drinking at hazardous levels need professional support to overcome what are often multi-faceted challenges. Those people concerned about their drinking, or about the drinking of someone around them, should seek help from a health professional or visit Drinkaware.co.uk and the NHS for free support and practical advice.

Notes to editors:

  1. John Timothy is available for broadcast interviews on request.
  2. The Portman Group is the alcohol industry regulator and social responsibility body. It has over 130 Code signatories from producers, retailers and membership bodies.
  3. The Portman Group is funded by eleven member companies: Asahi UK Ltd; Aston Manor Cider; Bacardi; Brown-Forman; Budweiser Brewing Group UK&I; Carlsberg UK; Diageo GB; Heineken UK; Mast-Jäegermeister UK; Pernod Ricard UK and SHS Drinks.
  4. Statistics on drinking figures are drawn from the following surveys:
  1. Alcohol sales data are drawn from the ONS showing a 31.4% increase in alcohol volume sales in March 2020. These increased retail sales are more than offset by a collapse in sales in pubs, bars, clubs and restaurants all shuttered by the lockdown. Just taking beer as an example, sales in pubs slumped 40% in March compared to the same period last year, whilst sales in supermarkets and off-licences grew 10.6%, with overall beer sales down by 12.7% compared to last year.

As lockdown loomed over a month ago, we saw numerous media articles featuring supermarket shelves stripped bare as people stockpiled alcohol and other items in the face of continued social distancing measures.

UK alcohol sales jumped by 22% in March, representing an extra £200m in sales of wine, beer and spirits compared to 2019, giving rise to concern that increased sales would be reflected in increased consumption fuelling binge drinking at home.

Several weeks on and, despite the initial fears, the emerging evidence suggests that stockpiling has not resulted in increased consumption. Consider the nation laying down wine, beer, cider and spirits in expectation of supply problems (which haven’t materialised), rather than millions of raucous isolation parties across the nation’s living rooms.

Evidence from researchers, including Alcohol Change UK, shows that around four in five British drinkers continue to drink responsibly, either by drinking the same or less compared to before lockdown. Prior to the lockdown, data from across the UK showed that 78% of adults did not drink or stuck within UK Government weekly drinking guidelines.

For some, the lockdown is providing the impetus to reduce their alcohol intake, with between a quarter and a third of drinkers cutting down or cutting out alcohol altogether.

Recently released surveys highlighting this trend include:

Separately, the latest figures from Kantar show that sales of low and no alcohol products at supermarkets and off-license have increased 18% in 2020 compared to the first quarter of 2019, with a rise of 32.5% immediately prior to lockdown, showing how much they have become a new part of many Brits’ responsible drinking habits.

Furthermore, while retail alcohol purchases are up, this is more than offset by a collapse in sales in pubs, bars, clubs and restaurants shuttered by the lockdown. Just taking beer as an example, sales in pubs slumped 40% in March compared to the same period last year, whilst sales in supermarkets and off-licences grew 10.6%, with overall beer sales down by 12.7% compared to last year.

Whilst the majority of the findings from the surveys are encouraging, the surveys still seem to indicate a concerning trend that around one in five are drinking more at home.

These findings should not be overlooked, especially as the lockdown and social distancing measures continue into the future.

If you are worried about your own or someone else’s drinking, Drinkaware has created a coronavirus information hub focused on providing free support and practical advice to help people cut back.

We would urge all consumers who choose to drink to do so responsibly and to look out for each other and their own physical and mental health during this difficult and unprecedented time.

Last week the Government published the latest figures on underage drinking rates across England which suggest a plateauing of children drinking underage and the proportion of 11-14 year olds saying they have drank at all remaining static. This means there is evidently more to do promote an alcohol-free childhood.

However, we should also take into account our progress in tackling underage drinking which have until recently been in decline for many years, with children today significantly less likely to drink alcohol or think that getting drunk is okay than in previous generations.

Furthermore, the latest research from the International Alliance for Responsible Drinking (IARD) shows that underage drinking has declined in over two-thirds of the 63 countries where national data is available.

YouGov polling conducted for IARD shows that 64% of UK respondents thought that underage drinking rates had either increased (30%) or stayed the same (34%) in the last 10 years, compared to 19% who thought it had declined.

Whilst the latest figures for England are concerning, Government data shows that underage drinking has fallen across every nation in the UK over the past decade:

Under the old Government methodology, the proportion of pupils in England who said that they had ever had an alcoholic drink declined by 31% from 55% in 2006 to 38% in 2014. Under the new methodology, the figures have remained around 44% in 2016 and 2018.

Those who admitted to drinking at least once a week declined 73% from 2006 and 2014 and has remained static at 6% since 2016.

Attitudes towards underage drinking are changing amongst young people, with a 22% fall since 2003 in the number of 11-15 year olds who think it is ok to try alcohol to see what it’s like and a 33% fall in those who think it is ok to get drunk to see what it’s like, although there has been a slight increase since 2014.

A further welcome consequence of falling underage drinking rates can be seen in hospital admissions, with a 55% fall in alcohol-specific admissions for under-18s in England over the last decade.

The IARD polling also shows that 44% of UK respondents believe that the alcohol industry has a responsibility for preventing underage drinking. UK drinks producers and retailers take this responsibility seriously and have put a huge amount of effort and resources into robust ID schemes, support for local partnership initiatives and effective industry self-regulation of alcohol marketing.

Schemes such as the ‘Challenge 25’ programme operated by retailers help to deny minors access to alcohol by requiring staff to ask any customer who looks under 25 for proof of age.

The Portman Group also continues to enforce Rule 3.2(h) of our Code of Practice on the Naming, Packaging and Promotion of Alcoholic Drinks to push companies to modify or remove from the UK market products which have been judged by our Independent Complaints Panel to have a particular appeal to under-18s. The Panel has upheld complaints against 7 products under this rule in 2019 alone and 23 products over the past five years.

These actions, along with effective education from parents, guardians and schools, have helped push underage drinking rates to further lows throughout the UK.

The UK alcohol industry will continue to work hard to build on this sustained progress of the last 10-15 years.

A recent complaint about Pernod Ricard UK’s Jameson Irish Whiskey Barrelback On-Trade Promotion was upheld by the Independent Complaints Panel (Panel). A copy of the full decision can be read here.

The complainant, Alcohol Change UK, expressed concern that the on-trade promotion offers customers the opportunity to buy a single measure of Jameson’s whiskey in a small metal barrel which can be hooked on to a pint glass. Alcohol Change UK said that the on-trade promotion encourages consumers to ‘try a measure of Jameson with your pint’ – therefore for each pint of beer (around 2.5 units of alcohol) customers are encouraged to add another unit in the form of whiskey, increasing the alcoholic content of each round by 40%.

Reviewing the on-trade promotion in detail, the Panel believed: 

On this basis, the Panel upheld the complaint under Code Rule 3.2(f) for encouraging irresponsible consumption as the promotional material needed to communicate the sipping nature of the serve. The Panel however did not uphold the complaint under Code Rule 3.2(g) because the promotional material did not ‘urge’ consumers to drink rapidly or to ‘down’ a product in one.

A spokesperson for Pernod Ricard UK said: “As one of the leading wines and spirits companies, Pernod Ricard UK is committed to the responsible marketing and promotion of its products. We acknowledge the Independent Complaints Panel’s decision and in light of this, we will ensure that future adverts of the Jameson Barrelback Whiskey clearly communicate a sipping message.”

Commenting on the decision by the Independent Complaints Panel, a Portman Group spokesperson said: “This decision by the Independent Complaints Panel highlight that producers should ensure that promotions and point-of-sale material do not encourage irresponsible drinking. Producers should think carefully about what is conveyed by the overall impression of promotions and point-of-sale material and speak to our advisory service if in any doubt. We are pleased that Pernod Ricard UK will no longer be using this point-of-sale material and are obtaining advice from our Advisory Service on future promotions.”

For more information please contact:

Melanie Woodnick

Interim Director of External Affairs

0207 290 1463 or 07719 324021 or mwoodnick@localhost

Notes to editors:

  1. A copy of the full decision from the Independent Complaints Panel (Panel) can be read here.
  2. All complaint decisions made by the Panel are available on the Portman Group website.
  3. The Portman Group’s Code of Practice on the Naming, Packaging and Promotion of Alcoholic Drinks applies to, all pre-packaged alcoholic drinks and the promotional activities of all drinks producers. 
  4. This complaint was considered under the fifth edition of the Code of Practice. The sixth edition of the Code was published on 4th March and will come into full effect on 23rd September 2019. Complaints received after 23rd September will be subject to the rules in the sixth edition.
  5. The Panel, which hears complaints, is chaired by Jenny Watson CBE. The other members of the Panel are: David Macdonald, Angela McNab, Rosalie Weetman, Jon Collins, Graeme Mckenzie, Claire Fowler, Daniel Jourdan and Rachel Childs. More information on the Panel can be found here.
  6. Since the Code was introduced in 1996, the packaging and/or marketing of over 140 drinks have been found to breach the Code. In the case of a Code breach concerning a drink’s packaging or point-of-sale material, a timetable for implementing the necessary changes – not normally exceeding three months – will be supplied in writing to the company concerned. Retailers may be notified of the decision taken by the Independent Complaints Panel and requested not to replenish stocks or point-of-sale material of any product found in breach of the Code, after the date specified by the Code Secretariat.
  7. The Portman Group provides a free and confidential Advisory Service for alcohol producers to check products prior to launch and seek advice on responsible alcohol marketing. Over 2000 separate advice requests have been answered since 2010. Email: advice@localhost.
  8. The Portman Group is the alcohol industry regulator. It is funded by its eight member companies: Bacardi Brown-Forman Brands UK; Budweiser Brewing Group UK&I; Carlsberg UK; Diageo GB; Heineken UK; Jägermeister UK; Molson Coors Brewing Company UK; Pernod Ricard UK.
  9. An image of Jameson Irish Whiskey Barrelback On-Trade Promotion is available on request.

Company:

Pernod Ricard

Breach:

Yes

Final Decision:

18 July 2019

Considered under the 5th Edition of the Code.

COMPLAINT SUMMARY

The ‘barrelback’ promotion takes place in the on-trade.  Customers are offered the opportunity to buy a single measure of Jameson’s whiskey in a small metal barrel which can be hooked onto a pint glass.  These are also A5 cardboard A-boards encouraging customers to ‘try a measure of Jameson with your pint’ and advising them there is ‘no more either or’, i.e. there is no need to choose between a pint and a shot since they can have both at the same time- see attached image.  So, for each pint of beer (around 2.5 units of alcohol), customers are encouraged to add another unit in the form of whiskey, increasing the alcoholic content of each round by 40%.

I would like to note that in 2009 the Panel ruled against Mmwah! shots on the grounds that (amongst other things) ‘the product was clearly designed to encourage additional alcohol consumption among on-trade clientele’ and that ‘the whole idea of the product was to drive incremental consumption’.  Both those criteria appear to be applicable to the Jameson ‘barrelback’ promotion”. 

COMPLAINANT

Alcohol Change UK

DECISION

Under Code paragraph 3.2(f)

A drink, its packaging and any promotional material or activity should not in any direct or indirect way encourage illegal, irresponsible or immoderate consumption, such as drink-driving, binge drinking or drunkenness.

UPHELD

Under Code paragraph 3.2(g)

A drink, its packaging and any promotional material or activity should not in any direct or indirect way urge the consumer to drink rapidly or to ‘down’ a product in one

NOT UPHELD

THE COMPANY’S SUBMISSION

The company began by stating that, as a founding member of the Portman Group, it is committed to the responsible marketing and promotion of its products. The company stated that it has a strong track record of compliance with the Portman Group Code and that it regularly runs training sessions with the Portman Group and liaises frequently with the Advisory Service; including on this particular promotion.

The company explained the ‘Jameson Barrelback’ serve in context of the UK’s Chief Medical Officers’ (CMO) guidelines and past Independent Complaint Panel (Panel) precedents under the Code. The company stated that the UK CMO 2016 guidelines recommend that it is safest not to drink more than 14 units on a weekly basis, and to spread drinking evenly over three or more days. The company explained that although no daily or single occasion threshold is in place, this roughly translates to 4.67 units of alcohol consumption in a single serve or over the course of a day.

In addition to this, the company stated that whilst the fifth edition of the Code historically upheld 4 units as the threshold for immoderate consumption, this threshold was removed when the 2016 CMO guidelines came into force. The company stated that this was reflected in a Panel ruling from January 2017 regarding a can of K Cider which, at 4.2 units in a non-resealable container, was deemed acceptable under the Code. The company stated that this therefore set 4.2 units as the threshold for immoderate consumption under the fifth edition of the Code. The company also noted that the sixth edition of the Code, which comes into force in September 2019, advises 4 units as a single-serve limit alongside ‘mitigating factors’ such as pricing, share messaging, and premium status whilst setting 6 units as the absolute threshold.

The company explained that a Jameson Barrelback serve could range from 3 to 4 units, depending on the ABV of the pint with which it is served. The company stated that a standard 3.6% ABV pint would equate to 2 units, a higher-strength pint of 5.2% ABV would be 3 units, and a 25ml serve of Jameson Irish Whiskey would be 1 unit. The company highlighted that the Jameson Barrelback promotion was therefore compliant whether it be considered under a threshold of 4 units, 4.2 units, 4.67 units or 6 units.

The company stated that it was perfectly acceptable to mix two drinks within moderation, and that the Barrelback (also known as a Boilermaker) was an established drink in the on-trade. The company stated that there was nothing in the promotion of the Barrelback which suggested the consumer should drink rapidly or have multiple rounds. In direct contrast to this, the promotion included the lines “Enjoy Jameson responsibly. Drinkaware.co.uk for the facts”, alongside “Try a Jameson Barrelback. A measure of Jameson with your pint.  No more either or”. The company referenced other widely available cocktails which mix a greater number of alcoholic drinks, with a potentially higher unit content, such as a Long Island Iced Tea.

The company also highlighted the advice it received from the Advisory Service and noted that while it was not binding it said “it is possible to pair whisky (sic) with a separate alcoholic beverage as long as the combined serve does not go above 4 units of alcohol and there are no instructions for the consumer to down one or both of the drinks as part of the experience”. The company stated that the Jameson Barrelback promotion satisfied both these criteria, at 3 to 4 units, and by including a responsible drinking message alongside a link to Drinkaware.co.uk. As part of the company’s provisional response, it highlighted that advice received from the Advisory Service is advisory and that in this instance it believed that it did not need to explicitly communicate a ‘sipping’ message.

In response to the Panel’s provisional decision, the company sent the Jameson Barrelback drinks container so that the Panel could see first-hand that the container had a flat base with a small hook which enabled the consumer to sip the whiskey alongside their pint as opposed to encouraging down-in-one consumption.

The company further explained that the accompanying online educational materials for the serve made it clear that the beer and whiskey should be sipped, with the emphasis on savouring the product rather than rapidly consuming either drink.

THE PANEL’S ASSESSMENT

The Panel acknowledged that the concept of combining a pint of beer and a shot of whiskey was not a new serve,’, but felt that it was not necessarily an everyday serve in most parts of the UK. Some Panel members had seen this described as a ‘Boilermaker’ but others had not. The Panel considered that most UK consumers would not be familiar with the serve and that at face value on the point-of-sale material the serve looked more akin to a chaser where a consumer would down the shot of whiskey before or after consuming the beer, with the second product attached to the main glass to make it easier to carry. The Panel noted the company’s response to the provisional decision and agreed that the online educational materials which promoted a sipping message were useful but concluded that a sipping message should also have been included on the point-of-sale material given the innovative nature of the serve.

The Panel considered the serve alongside the accompanying messaging which included the phrase “no more either or”. The Panel were concerned that the message insinuated that consumers did not have to make a choice between different drinks and encouraged consumers to drink more than they otherwise would have done.

The Panel noted that the company’s marketing agency had received advice from the Advisory Service regarding the promotion. Since the company had referenced the advice in their response the Panel presumed that the company had read the full advice.  The Panel noted that this advice recommended that the promotion include a sipping message as the Advisory Service highlighted that most UK consumers may not be familiar with the serve. The Panel noted that this message was absent from the final execution of the promotion. Therefore while advice was sought, part of it was ignored.

In relation to the promotion as a whole, the Panel concluded that there was a need to include clearer messaging because UK consumers would be more familiar with the chaser style of serve. The Panel’s view was that the creative therefore needed to work harder to communicate the intended sipping nature of the serve.  The Panel noted the company’s response, and its points concerning immoderate consumption, but concluded that the point-of-sale did encourage irresponsible consumption and accordingly upheld the promotion under Code Rule 3.2(f).

The Panel also considered the promotion in relation to 3.2(g) and in particular considered the Jameson Barrelback drinks container and noted that it was smaller than appeared on the promotion, could easily be set down with a flat base and that the inside of the barrel included a 25ml serving line.  The Panel discussed the appearance of the container and took the view that it was less reminiscent of a shot glass due to its barrel design. The Panel noted that the barrel was opaque, in contrast to traditionally transparent shot glasses, which prevented others from seeing how much liquid remained in the container, and believed therefore that there would be less pressure on consumers to down the whiskey in one which, to some extent, supported the intended sipping nature of the serve. Finally, the Panel discussed the company’s point that the creative stated ‘with your pint’. Taken in the round, the Panel agreed that the Barrelback container was not urging down-in-one consumption and accordingly did not uphold the promotion under Code Rule 3.2(g).

ACTION BY COMPANY

The company will no longer be using this point-of-sale material.

Company:

Harwood Drinks Ltd

Breach:

Yes

Final Decision:

10 December 2015

Considered under the 4th Edition of the Code.

Complaint Summary

‘They are very appealing to a younger age group. Style of writing, flavours, cute size, easily squirrelled away’ and because it ‘encourages ‘snacking’ on alcohol, and ultimately alcoholism’.

Complainant

Portman Group (acting in lieu of a member of the public)

Decision

Under Code paragraph 3.2(f)

A drink, its packaging and any promotional material or activity should not in any direct or indirect way encourage illegal, irresponsible or immoderate consumption, such as drink-driving, binge-drinking or drunkenness

NOT UPHELD

Under Code paragraph 3.2(h):

A drink, its packaging and any promotional material or activity should not in any direct or indirect way have particular appeal to under-18s.

UPHELD

The company’s submission

The Company began by stating that the product has exactly the same brand, alcoholic content and style of writing as the Mmwah test tube product which was subject to a complaint in 2009 and was upheld under Code rules 3.2 (f) (g) and (h). The company noted that the 20ml bottle is sold only in a pack of five (not separately) and that the change in containers from test tubes to miniature bottles was done in part to address the concerns that test tube drinks could not be stood upright and may encourage “down in one drinking”. The company noted market research conducted by the Portman Group in 2010 which demonstrated that test tube containers do not necessarily urge rapid or down-in-one drinking. Despite the new position with regard to test tube containers, the company felt the change in containers would be viewed as a positive development.

The company said that all of the flavours in the pack are the same flavours that where examined in the complaint against the test tubes, blue raspberry being one of them. The company added that blue raspberry is a standard flavour used by many companies in this industry and is always blue in appearance.

The company said that all miniatures have the potential to be squirreled away and that due to the low volumes of liquid (20ml) and exceptionally low alcohol content of their products (0.3 units per bottle) it would be extremely expensive and would require many miniature bottles to exceed the recommended daily unit guidelines.

The Panel’s submission

The Panel’s discussions and deliberations focused on the pack of five 20ml miniature bottles marketed together and enclosed within an external wrapping – as supplied by the producer for the Panel’s consideration.

The Panel first addressed whether the product would encourage people to drink immoderately or irresponsibly. The Panel noted that the alcoholic nature of the product was clearly stated on the primary and secondary packaging. The Panel then discussed the alcoholic content of the product and noted that if someone ‘snacked’ on all five 20ml bottles in the pack, the total units consumed would equate to 1.5. The Panel noted that 1.5 units of alcohol was below the UK Chief Medical Officer’s daily unit guidelines for men (4 units) and women (3 units) and therefore did not consider that the product encouraged immoderate consumption. Accordingly, the Panel did not uphold this complaint under Code rule 3.2(f).

The Panel went on to consider whether the product held a particular appeal to under-18s. The Panel discussed the style of font, product name, colour and imagery used on both the primary and secondary packaging. They considered each aspect individually and also the overall impression conveyed by the product.

The Panel discussed the bubble writing style of font used on the packaging (primary and secondary). The Panel agreed that this style was similar to products that were particularly aimed at young girls, for example some ‘princess-themed’ products. In addition, when noting the black outline of the text, the Panel referred to previous expert opinion that it had received from a youth-marketing agency in early 2015. The agency had previously advised the Panel that text with bold black outlines/borders was commonly used to aim products at under-18s. The Panel also compared the font style with that used on the test tube product (plain black) which was subject to complaint in 2009. The Panel agreed that the new style was more childlike in style.

The Panel then discussed the name ‘Mmwah’ and agreed that it was reflective of language used by teenage girls and that the name could therefore be particularly appealing to this demographic. Taking these considerations into account, the Panel agreed that, in combination, the style of font and name could increase the product’s appeal to a younger demographic. Whilst the Panel expressed concerns around the font and language used, it did not consider that these elements alone would have a particular appeal to under-18s.

Lastly, the Panel discussed the appearance and overall impression conveyed by the pack of five. When considering the different brightly coloured miniature bottles displayed alongside each other with the wrap-around packaging, the Panel agreed that the overall appearance was similar to that of products which were aimed at under-18s; particularly young girls. Whilst the Panel acknowledged that it may not be intentional, it noted that the pack of five was reminiscent of non-alcoholic products designed to look ‘pretty’ like a box of colourful pens or cosmetics such as nail varnish. The Panel concluded that this similarity in its overall appearance could increase its appeal to under-18s.

The Panel acknowledged the small volume of alcohol contained in the product and the ‘18’ icon displayed on both the primary and secondary packaging. However, when considering the overall impression conveyed by the pack of five the Panel concluded that the childlike cues of the product, when taken together, (style of font, bright colours, language and miniature size) would cause the product to have a particular appeal to under-18s. Accordingly the Panel upheld the complaint under code paragraph 3.2(h).

Action by the company

The company has advised that they intend to work with the Portman Group’s Advisory Service to make changes to the product in order to bring it in line with the Code. The Panel noted and welcomed the company’s willingness to work with the Portman Group and to amend the product accordingly.

Retailer Alert Bulletin